People on the Old Timeline

Who are the people on the old timeline?

People on the old timeline are those who consciously or unconsciously sustain a reality based on domination, war, division, exploitation, manipulation and the belief that strength gives someone the right to decide about the lives of others. This is not only about national leaders. The old model needs many elements: people who give orders, people who create propaganda, companies that profit from armaments, officials who carry out instructions, media that inflame fear and ordinary citizens who abandon their own discernment.

Not everyone, however, bears the same responsibility. Consciously starting a war is one thing, profiting from it is another, carrying out orders out of conviction is something else again, and acting under coercion, as a result of indoctrination or in a situation where one’s life is genuinely threatened is different still. If we want to understand the old timeline, we cannot place everyone in the same category. We need truth, justice, compassion and clear boundaries at the same time.

The architecture of wasting human energy

War is one of the most visible expressions of the old timeline. It takes lives and health, destroys cities, separates families and leaves trauma that can continue for generations. At the same time, it consumes an unimaginable amount of money, knowledge, labour, technology and creative potential.

According to SIPRI data, global military expenditure reached approximately 2.9 trillion dollars in 2025. This was the eleventh consecutive year of growth. The revenues of the world’s one hundred largest arms-producing and military services companies amounted to approximately 679 billion dollars in 2024 and reached a record level. Behind these figures are millions of hours of human work and enormous quantities of raw materials, energy, research and invention.

Imagine what could be created if even part of this potential were directed elsewhere. We could build homes, develop healthcare, provide people with clean water and food, restore damaged natural environments, create better education, peaceful technology and energy systems serving entire communities. An engineer designing a missile capable of destroying a city could work on a device that saves lives. A factory producing weapons could manufacture machinery, building components, means of transport or water purification equipment.

Human intelligence is not the problem. The problem is the direction in which we send it. The old timeline can use the greatest human talents to create increasingly sophisticated instruments of destruction. The New Earth needs the same intelligence, but directed towards life.

War also wastes the energy of people who will never set foot on a battlefield. Entire societies live in tension, follow one threat after another, argue, choose sides and give their attention to narratives built on fear. The more energy a conflict consumes, the less remains for family, health, creativity, development and the building of real solutions.

Who decides, who profits, who carries out orders and who suffers?

War does not begin by itself. It needs decisions made by specific people, financing structures, transport, weapons, propaganda and an entire network of people carrying out tasks. United Nations documents concerning the risk of atrocity crimes show that large-scale violence requires organisational capability: people, money, resources, logistics, permission and language that prepares society to harm a designated opponent.

The greatest responsibility rests with people who possess knowledge, power and a genuine ability to choose, yet consciously organise violence, inflame hatred or benefit from suffering. This applies to leaders making decisions, people planning operations, propagandists stripping victims of their humanity, and those who use conflicts to increase their own wealth and influence.

A war economy exists, and within it people and companies receive enormous contracts. This does not mean that every employee of such a company wants war. It does, however, reveal an uncomfortable relationship: when peace reduces orders and tension increases revenue, economic interests can begin to support further armament. This is accompanied by lobbying, influence over politics, the financing of narratives and the movement of people between public positions and the industry that benefits from government decisions.

Lower down in this system are the people who carry out orders. Some do so out of conviction, others for money or career advancement, and still others because of fear. There are also conscripts, people subjected to years of indoctrination, people being blackmailed, civilians trapped between opposing forces and soldiers who had no safe way to refuse. Their situation cannot be judged in the same way as the decisions of someone sitting far from the front and knowingly sending others to their deaths.

The greatest burden is usually borne by those who had the least influence: the dead and wounded, families, children, refugees, people deprived of their homes, and future generations inheriting trauma, debt and environmental destruction. An honest conversation about responsibility therefore cannot end with the simple statement that “everyone is guilty”. It must ask: Who made the decision? Who knew? Who could have refused? Who profited? Who was forced? And who paid the highest price?

How people disconnect from their own conscience

Most people do not want to see themselves as perpetrators of evil. To participate in harm while preserving an image of themselves as good people, they need an inner justification. The psychologist Albert Bandura described this process as moral disengagement.

Violence is then given a noble name. It is no longer killing, but “defending values”, “restoring order” or carrying out a “necessary operation”. Words conceal reality. Responsibility is transferred to a superior: “I was only following orders.” When a task is divided among hundreds of people, each person sees only a small part of it and can pretend that someone else is responsible for the whole.

Obedience to authority plays a major role. Research following the experiments of Stanley Milgram has shown that situational pressure and the presence of someone considered entitled to give orders can lead many people to cross their own boundaries. A person stops asking whether an action is right and begins asking only whether the procedure was followed correctly.

The most dangerous stage is taking away another person’s humanity. Before a society accepts violence against a particular group, it is often first taught to call its members a threat, a disease, parasites or beings of a lower category. A meta-analysis covering 120 studies and more than 128,000 people indicates that explicit dehumanisation is particularly strongly associated with support for violence between groups.

The history of Nazi propaganda shows where the consistent combination of lies, fear, division and dehumanisation can lead. Propaganda helped win support for war and persecution, portrayed victims as a dangerous enemy and conditioned the rest of society to become indifferent.

This mechanism does not belong exclusively to the past or to one country. Whenever someone tries to convince us that an entire group is less human, does not deserve compassion or represents one collective evil, a warning light should come on within us. We will not create the New Earth by turning the same mechanism against people on the old timeline.

Does fear create a field to which something can attach itself?

We can observe and describe the material level of war through documents, data, history and psychology. There is, however, another way of looking at reality. For thousands of years, people have told stories about invisible forces that influence consciousness, exploit human weaknesses or attempt to direct human behaviour.

The Gnostic text The Hypostasis of the Archons describes rulers associated with darkness, ignorance and enslavement. In the Mesopotamian story of Atrahasis, the gods create humans to perform work on their behalf and later gather around an offering. In the Theosophical tradition, Annie Besant and C.W. Leadbeater described thought-forms arising from human thoughts and emotions. Different eras used different names, but a similar theme returned: people may create an invisible field that begins to affect them in return.

Today, many people believe that certain extraterrestrial, interdimensional or energetic beings feed on human fear and suffering. Online accounts sometimes use the term “loosh” — an energy said to be created during pain, conflict and intense negative emotion. Others speak of archons, energetic parasites, demons or forms of consciousness whose nature is not yet understood.

It is not true that hardly anyone allows for the existence of a spiritual reality or intelligence beyond Earth. International studies by the Pew Research Center show that belief in spirits, life after death or spiritual energies in nature is widespread. In another survey, 65 per cent of American adults said that, in their view, intelligent life exists on other planets.

These findings show how open many people are to a reality extending beyond what is directly visible. They do not, however, prove that extraterrestrial or interdimensional beings control wars. A report by NASA’s independent study team on unidentified anomalous phenomena states that peer-reviewed scientific literature currently contains no conclusive evidence of an extraterrestrial origin. At the same time, the absence of such evidence is not proof that life beyond Earth does not exist, nor that we have already understood every level of reality.

I therefore want to remain open without pretending to be certain. Ancient religious texts are evidence of historical beliefs. Theosophical thought-forms are an esoteric interpretation. Contemporary accounts of entities feeding on fear are a hypothesis and a spiritual perspective shared by some people. Science has not so far confirmed that such beings direct contemporary conflicts. This does not mean, however, that we must forbid ourselves from asking questions.

People create evil, and possible entities may amplify it — my perspective

My perspective is that evil does not appear solely because some invisible being suddenly takes control of an innocent person. People first open the way for it through greed, the desire for power, hatred, the need to dominate, fear, indifference and consent to harm.

When thousands or millions of people experience fear, despair, anger and suffering over a long period, a powerful collective field may arise. In the language of this project, it can be called the egregore of the old timeline. I believe that unknown beings from other planets or dimensions, or energetic entities, may attach themselves to such a field. They may feed on it, strengthen it and influence people who have already opened themselves to violence, arrogance or the desire for power.

I see a feedback loop here. Human fear and greed lead to propaganda, violence and war. War creates even more fear and suffering. This collective field may attract or nourish other entities, which then amplify chaos, division and destructive human impulses. The stronger the egregore becomes, the easier it is for more people to surrender their attention and will to it.

I do not present this as a mechanism conclusively established by contemporary science. It is my spiritual perspective and an attempt to connect observations of human behaviour with themes that recur across different traditions. Many people see reality in a similar way, although they use different names and do not agree on everything.

Even if such entities exist, this does not release people from responsibility. We cannot say that human beings have nothing to do with their own decisions because an invisible force controls everything. That would be another surrender of our own power. People can still recognise manipulation, refuse to carry out a harmful order, stop repeating propaganda, refuse to feed hatred and choose a different direction.

To put it plainly, as humanity we are still far too easily deceived. We hand our thinking over to authorities, believe messages built on fear, defend group identities and allow someone else to point out another enemy for us. If we do not learn to exercise our own discernment, no external rescue will solve the problem on our behalf. The first boundary is the recovery of our own conscience.

Compassion does not mean consenting to harm

People who remain on the old timeline are still human. Many of them act from unconsciousness, fear, trauma, pressure from their surroundings or the need to belong. Some have heard only one version of the world since childhood. Others came to believe that obedience would keep them safe. There are also those who gradually crossed one boundary after another until they stopped noticing how far they had moved away from their own humanity.

Understanding this process does not mean consenting to violence. Compassion for the perpetrator cannot deprive the victim of protection. A person has the right to say: I understand that you are acting from fear, but I will not allow you to harm me or others. They can preserve evidence, end contact, call for help, report a threat and demand accountability. A calm boundary is not revenge.

Love for oneself includes the ability to say “no”. Love for another person also does not mean allowing them to do anything they want. Stopping someone from causing further destruction can be an expression of love because it prevents them from deepening the harm for which they will be responsible.

This is why we say goodbye to the Old Earth with love. We do not send hatred towards people who continue to feed it. We can wish for their awakening, the recovery of their conscience and their return to their own humanity. At the same time, we do not hand them control over our lives or pretend that violence is something we should simply accept.

This is particularly important when speaking about invisible forces. If we begin to call every opponent a demon, reptilian or soulless monster, we will activate the very mechanism of dehumanisation that we have already recognised as part of the old timeline. We can leave room for the possible existence of unknown entities, but without evidence we should not attribute an extraterrestrial nature or collaboration with such beings to a specific living person.

Reclaiming our energy for the New Earth

I am not writing about the old timeline so that we can spend every day watching its darkness. I do not want wars, propagandists, arms producers or possible energetic entities to receive all our attention. If they did, they would continue to feed on our lives even if we claimed to be fighting them.

The problem must be seen clearly, named and understood. Then we must reclaim our own energy.

We do this when we verify information instead of automatically repeating whatever has provoked the greatest fear in us. We do it when we refuse to let a group strip another person of their dignity. When we ask about the consequences of decisions, sources of funding and the people who benefit. When we refuse to surrender our conscience to an authority. When we protect victims, establish boundaries and do not allow understanding to be used as an excuse for harm.

We can direct the energy we reclaim towards what we want to see in the world: peaceful relationships, honest businesses, the protection of life, the regeneration of nature, education, health, creativity, community and technology that serves people. Every hour of work, every thought, every choice and every consciously spent unit of money is a small vote for a particular kind of reality.

The old timeline says that human beings are powerless, must obey those who are stronger and will always need an enemy. The new timeline reminds us that we can think independently, cooperate and create solutions without building our identity on hatred towards the other side.

We do not have to wait until everyone awakens at the same time. Nor do we have to defeat the whole Old Earth before beginning a new life. Every day, we can stop reproducing at least one of its mechanisms: one automatic reaction of fear, one lie, one act of contempt, one instance of thoughtless obedience or one need to dominate.

In this way, we stop feeding the old egregore and strengthen the field of the New Earth. Not by denying darkness, but by consciously choosing where we direct our own energy. Not through hatred of people on the old timeline, but through truth, responsibility, compassion and boundaries.

The Old Earth can end in every moment when a person recovers their own conscience. The New Earth begins in every decision that serves life.